Book & Video Reviews

Buy Issues Online

Contact Us

E-Updates

Frequently Asked Questions

Legal Project

Links

Not About Wrestling

Our Writers

Testimonials

-------------------

Looking For Something On The Wrestling Perspective Web site?

Then Just Enter Your Keyword(s) In The Space Below


-----------------

Order your books, CDs, videos
and other items from Amazon.Com

Just Click Below

In Association with Amazon.com

-------------------

-------------------

-------------------

LESLIE GOODMAN FLIEHR v. RICHARD M. FLIEHR

(56 N.C. App. 465; 289 S.E.2d 105)

Ric Flair appeals a child support and alimony settlement.

 

LESLIE GOODMAN FLIEHR v. RICHARD M. FLIEHR

No. 8126DC570

COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA


56 N.C. App. 465; 289 S.E.2d 105

 
February 3, 1982, Heard in the Court of Appeals  

March 16, 1982, Filed


PRIOR HISTORY:      
Appeal by defendant from Lanning, Judge. Order entered 7 January 1981 in District Court, Mecklenburg County.

DISPOSITION: Dismissed.

HEADNOTES:  
Appeal and Error ? 6.2 -- child support order in conjunction with alimony pendente lite -- no right of appeal

Orders for child support which are entered in conjunction with orders awarding alimony pendente lite are not appealable until entry of a final order on the claim for permanent alimony.

SYLLABUS: This is an appeal by defendant husband from an award to plaintiff wife of child support and alimony pendente lite.

COUNSEL: Michael S. Shulimson and Marvin Schiller for plaintiff appellee.

Mraz and Michael, by Mark A. Michael, for defendant appellant.

JUDGES: Arnold, Judge. Judges Clark and Whichard concur.

OPINION BY: ARNOLD

OPINION: We hold that this appeal must be dismissed as interlocutory according to this Court's holding in Stephenson v. Stephenson, 55 N.C. App. 250, 285 S.E. 2d 281 (1981).

In this case, unlike that in Stephenson, the child support order is not designated pendente lite by the court. However, we conclude that the policy articulated in Stephenson will be largely defeated if we permit appeals of right from child support orders entered in conjunction with orders for alimony pendente lite. As we stated in Stephenson, the backlog of appeals awaiting review by this Court is now so great that usually the only feasible purpose for pursuing appeals from temporary support orders is to delay execution of the orders. It is our intent to eliminate use of this Court to achieve this unacceptable purpose. We conclude, therefore, that orders for child support which are entered in conjunction with orders awarding alimony pendente lite are not appealable until entry of a final order on the plaintiff's claim for permanent alimony. To hold otherwise, moreover, would allow appeal from an order which adjudicates fewer than all claims in violation of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b). The order therefore is not subject to review by appeal and is

Dismissed.

http://wrestlingperspective.com/legal/flair.html

Webmasters: Please feel free to put a link to this page on your Web site. However, please do not cut and paste this case and put it on your site.

Copyright Notice: This page is Copyright © 2007 Wrestling Perspective. All Rights Reserved. This page may not be excerpted, reprinted, posted on Web sites/message boards, or distributed without written permission from Wrestling Perspective publishers Paul MacArthur and David Skolnick.

 

 

This page is Copyright © 2007 Wrestling Perspective.
All rights reserved.

Wrestling Perspective, WrestlingPerspective.com,
The Online Companion To Wrestling Perspective,
and The Phantom of the Ring are trademarked. In Perspective, A Different Perspective, WP, Perspective/Counter Perspective, The Thinking Fan's Newsletter, and For The Discriminating Wrestling Fan are servicemarks of Wrestling Perspective.

http://wrestlingperspective.com/legal/flair.html